« Please, gex youz acx xogexhez, Bew Yozk Ximes! | Main | Dear Reader, »

October 11, 2012



Hi Michael - Of course I seized upon this metaphor, as much as I love stone and stonework!
I think what he means is this: In Anglo-Saxon verse, instead of having a string of metrical "feet" or musical measures that are regular (i.e., da DA / da DA/ da DA / da DA), each line is built of two halves that are equivalent in terms of their loudness/weight/significance, but may or may not be (and usually are not) equal, that is, of the same rhythmic pattern. The rules that govern the composition of the two halves describe a complicated, intricate relationship based upon stresses and alliteration.
My allusion to the lack of a future tense in Germanic languages was idle speculation, based upon the observation that this very careful consideration of the relationship between the two half-lines (let's call them past and present) seems to supersede the forward motion (i.e. towards the future) that one feels in a more "sing-songy" type of verse, which is also often enhanced by a rhyme scheme that leaps forward.
So rather than a preoccupation with musicality, there is a preoccupation with building blocks of text in a tight, sturdy relationship with one another.
I hope that makes some sense!

Michael Edson

"more like masonry than music" is an intense and fascinating metaphor. Zomg. It opened me up, but I don't think I really understand it. I'm drowning in it. Can you say some more about what this means?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Reviewed on this blog

Blog powered by Typepad